It’s a simple matter of math, geography, and settlement patterns:
The numbers are pretty easy.
There is 1 of you–unless you’ve got an identical twin.
Two biological parents, four biological grandparents, eight biological great-grandparents.
The number keeps doubling each generation.
Counting yourself as generation one, by the time you have reached generation twenty, the seventeenth great-grandparent generation has been reached.
There are 524,288 theoretical blank spots in this generation of your pedigree chart.
Depending upon how “mixed” your ancestry is, there’s a reasonable chance of repetition.
Extend the lineage back ten more generations and the number is a staggering 536,870,912 ancestors!
Now there’s a database (documenting it is another story).
Thirty generations ago, the world’s population was significantly less than half a billion.
If you could trace each line that far (and chances are you can’t), there would be names repeated.
When one keeps in mind the small geographic area these individuals came from the number of “repeat” ancestors is not surprising.
When records allow tracing ancestors for two or three hundred years in a village of two or three hundred people, the chance of intermarriage is great.
If individuals from a small village migrate to the United States together (as some individuals from this area did) the geographic closeness may be replicated (at least for thefirst few generations).
Even if you are not related to yourself, it’s possible that you are related to an individual in more than one way.
There are many individuals who are “double first cousins” (where brothers married sisters, for example).
The relationship may get even more complicated than that.
Should we be telling people about all these double cousins? HA!
~~Written by Anonymous





Save This Page
“There is 1 of you–unless you’ve
got an identical twin.”
Actually there is still only one of you, even with a biological twin (Math 101). Your fingerprints are different, you have a different life path… it is a common misconception that identical twins are not two completely different beings, despite the genetic similarities.
From a genetic point of view, if you are an identical twin, unless (extremely rare) you and your twin marry identical twin siblings, your offspring will still have genetic differences than that of your twin’s offspring.
Comment by Janice — March 22, 2006 @ 6:09 pm
Um, I’m an identical twin, and there is still only ONE of me.. someone is using fuzzy math
J
Comment by Janice — March 30, 2006 @ 5:18 pm
I suppose that anonymous should have written: “There is 1 of you–unless you’ve got a clone or you are a clone..”.
Comment by genealogy — April 2, 2006 @ 1:46 pm
I am my own cousin … of a sort. I discovered that my parents were 5th cousins, twice removed and my dad was his own 6th cousin. That means I am my own 7th cousin, as well as my own 6th cousin twice removed!
That also means that I am my dad’s 6th cousin once removed and his 5th cousin 3 times removed! I am also my brother’s 7th cousin and 6th cousin twice removed. When it comes to my mother, I am her 6th cousin once removed as well as her son!
Confused?!?!?
Comment by Ian Feavearyear — May 14, 2006 @ 3:07 pm